Blockstream’s Liquid Network, a Bitcoin layer-2 protocol, suffered a significant security breach over the weekend, resulting in the extraction of approximately 4,000 Bitcoin from the network’s federation reserves.
Liquid Network hackers return 3,400 BTC, $47 million still missing
Majority of stolen Bitcoin returned
Self-identified whitehat attackers have returned 3,400 BTC out of nearly 4,000 BTC that were initially stolen from Liquid’s custody wallets. These wallets hold reserves to maintain the 1:1 peg for L-BTC, Liquid’s sidechain asset, with reserves originally holding about 4,200 BTC.
Following the breach, only 197 BTC remained in Liquid’s reserves, creating a shortfall for L-BTC holders. The exploit effectively depleted almost the entire collateral backing the token, raising concerns among users and prompting immediate action from network operators.
In response to the incident, network operators quickly disabled bridge infrastructure, paused activity across the network, and instructed cryptocurrency exchanges to halt L-BTC deposits and withdrawals. Other assets on Liquid, including tether, were not affected by the attack.
The attackers claimed to be acting as ethical hackers and expressed willingness to return the stolen digital assets once the underlying security vulnerability was resolved. Communication between Blockstream and the attackers took place through cryptographically signed messages embedded in Bitcoin blockchain transactions, allowing transparent and verifiable on-chain dialogue between the parties.
After Blockstream confirmed that all relevant security patches had been implemented and network updates were distributed, the attackers returned 3,400 BTC to the federation’s custody wallet. Around 598 BTC, valued at roughly $47 million, has not yet been returned.
Technical origin of the breach
Initial reports indicated that the unauthorized withdrawal was executed using SideSwap’s Peg-out Authorization Key. However, both Liquid and SideSwap representatives clarified the key itself had not been breached. SideSwap attributed the root cause to a flaw in Elements, the open-source codebase on which Liquid is built.
The majority of Liquid’s reserves have now been restored, with only a small but significant amount still missing. The fallout from the incident forced the network into a complete operational halt as technical teams worked to address and patch vulnerabilities.
Samson Mow, CEO of JAN3 and former Blockstream executive, verified the asset return on Monday and stated that discussions with the group responsible for the breach are ongoing, with roughly 598 BTC unaccounted for.
At current market prices, the returned Bitcoin is valued at approximately $270 million while the missing funds represent about $47 million. Debates have emerged within the crypto community regarding whether the attackers should be viewed as ethical hackers, especially as the unreturned Bitcoin may be interpreted as compensation. Blockstream has not described the outstanding funds as a bug bounty nor commented on the terms of any agreements with the group.
Network recovery and next steps
The Liquid Network remains offline as of Monday. Blockstream and federation members are working to finalize additional security measures, handle technical details related to blockchain fork resolution, and coordinate for a secure restart of operations. Updated software has now been distributed to stakeholders, and preparations to restore the network are ongoing.
Samson Mow cautioned users not to interact with the protocol’s peg-in addresses until an official reboot is confirmed. Until then, no further action is recommended for L-BTC holders.
Monitoring such technical events highlights the growing intersection of traditional finance and decentralized systems. While traditional markets still rely on complex broker networks, Wall Street is increasingly adopting Web3 technology. Investors are now using platforms like 1stepSwap to tokenize real-world assets such as shares in large US companies, gold, and silver, holding them directly in their crypto wallets and automatically accessing the best available prices in seconds without intermediaries.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold
Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.

UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)
UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.

SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips
SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.

$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."
