Maharashtra has become India’s first state to place cryptocurrencies and other virtual digital assets within a depositor-protection law targeting fraudulent investment schemes. According to local media reports, the amendment gives investigators a route to trace, seize, value, and liquidate digital holdings linked to investor losses.
State lawmakers passed changes to the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors in Financial Establishments Act, 1999, on July 1. The revised definition of “deposit” now includes virtual digital assets under Section 2(111) of the Income-tax Act, 2025.
The definition covers cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens, and electronic representations of value that can be transferred, stored, or traded. Previously, the MPID Act allowed authorities to attach property obtained through deposits, but digital assets were not expressly included.
That gap created uncertainty when fraudulent operators converted investor money into blockchain-based holdings. However, agencies can now identify, attach, assess, and sell assets connected to covered fraud cases.
Liquidation proceeds may then enter the MPID compensation process for affected depositors. In essence, the measure targets crypto-based Ponzi schemes and unauthorized deposit operations, rather than ordinary trading.
Alongside these expanded recovery powers, the amendment introduces procedural changes intended to prevent prolonged court delays. Designated MPID courts may grant only two adjournments, while a third requires exceptional circumstances supported by written reasons.
Moreover, a financial establishment challenging a recovery order must deposit 50% of its total liability with the competent authority before its appeal can proceed. This requirement is designed to discourage delaying tactics and accelerate compensation for depositors.
To support earlier enforcement, Minister of State for Home Yogesh Kadam said financial monitoring units would be established in every district. These teams would track suspicious entities, unrealistic return promises, and emerging investment schemes.
Kadam added that authorities could recover losses by valuing digital holdings instead of merely freezing them. The government linked these reforms to approximately ₹38,000 crore in unresolved financial-fraud recoveries.
While lawmakers broadly supported the stronger safeguards, several members called for additional measures. These included more special courts, closer oversight of cooperative institutions, and wider action against cybercrime networks and fraudulent social-media accounts.
However, the amendment does not make cryptocurrency legal tender or create a comprehensive licensing system for India’s digital asset sector. Instead, it strengthens recovery powers under an existing depositor-protection framework.
Ultimately, effective enforcement will depend on investigators’ ability to trace wallets, secure digital holdings, and liquidate volatile tokens while preserving their value for victims.
Related: India Regains Fifth-Largest Stock Market Spot as Market Value Tops $5 Trillion
