Rumors Claim Ripple Made $20 Billion Buyout Offer to Circle
Despite rumors of a $20 billion buyout offer from Ripple for Circle, there’s no evidence to support the claim, and the market response has apparently been minimal.
After Circle rejected Ripple’s $5 billion buyout offer, rumors are circulating that Ripple made another attempt. Despite the claim that it tried to offer Circle $20 billion, there is no tangible proof supporting this claim.
Commentators pointed out that Circle’s IPO was previously valued at around $5 billion, making a $20 billion offer seem totally ridiculous. It’s hard to be certain, but it appears that this rumor moved the market less than other recent false claims.
Did Ripple Offer Circle $20 Billion?
Circle, the issuer of the world’s second-largest stablecoin, turned a lot of heads when it rejected Ripple’s offer Wednesday. Circle’s IPO was delayed after tariff chaos, and analysts have raised concerns about the firm’s financials.
This made its refusal especially noteworthy, leading to community speculation.
Last night, rumors began to appear that Ripple’s CEO, Brad Garlinghouse, had made a bold new offer to Circle. Specifically, several prominent social media accounts claimed that Garlinghouse set a new offer at $20 billion.
This rumor gained new traction as crypto industry media publications began reporting on it. Still, Garlinghouse hasn’t publicly said anything.
Users immediately began urging caution, reminding the community that nothing had been confirmed. Meanwhile, several pieces of evidence explain why Ripple’s alleged Circle offer is not credible.
For example, although Circle’s IPO hasn’t launched yet, it still gives valuable market data:
“FYI, Circle’s IPO valuation is ~$5 billion (which is the valuation Ripple is looking at when it made its acquisition offer). There is no way Ripple would offer $20 billion for Circle. I see lots of people saying $5 billion is a low offer since Circle holds $60 billion in collateral…However, it does not own that collateral,” Dom Kwok, co-founder of EasyA, stated.
It’s hard to be certain, but the rumor has apparently left a minimal market impact. False claims have recently had an outsized influence over the crypto industry; rumors of Trump pausing tariffs caused huge chaos.
Similar statements regarding XRP ETF approval and OpenAI integrating Worldcoin proved untrue. Nonetheless, they were definitely influential.
Of course, it’s still difficult to draw a clear conclusion from this. Did large numbers of people believe Ripple’s alleged Circle offer? Were retail traders suspicious of the claim?
Hopefully, the crypto community will move past this period of credulity. When markets consistently move on misinformation, it can disrupt momentum.
Disclaimer: The content of this article solely reflects the author's opinion and does not represent the platform in any capacity. This article is not intended to serve as a reference for making investment decisions.
You may also like
How much CPO demand will Nvidia Rubin Ultra generate? Bernstein: Optical value per Pod will increase fivefold
Bernstein believes that the co-packaged optics (CPO) and fiber demand driven by Nvidia's Rubin Ultra architecture will surge significantly, with the optical content per Pod rising from $1 million to $5.4 million. This will propel the size of Nvidia's optical ecosystem market to $46.8 billion by 2028 (a 91% annual increase). Although the industry faces supply bottlenecks with InP substrates, the outlook remains positive. The institution reiterates its “outperform” rating for Lumentum, Coherent, and Ciena.
UBS Q3 implements a two-way strategy with gold options, heavily invests in technology stocks, and builds positions in SK Hynix (SKHY.US)
UBS Group (UBS.US) has submitted its Q3 holdings report (13F) as of September 30, 2026.
SpaceX (SPCX.US) reportedly attempts “de-Nvidiaization” at the rack level: developing Kessel cabinets to bypass L6 compute boards, purchasing only chips
SemiAnalysis: SpaceX has developed its own Kessel cabinet, bypassing Nvidia's L6 cards to provide more options for manufacturing its own hardware.
$3.7 billion “data center power equipment prepayments” abandoned! What did "the most active buyer of gas turbines", SoftBank, see?
In the second quarter of fiscal year 2026, SoftBank reported a net loss of $7.1 billion, primarily due to a $3.7 billion impairment charge from a $9.5 billion advance payment for power generation equipment for US data centers—of which about $2.9 billion was non-refundable and effectively lost. The CFO admitted that SoftBank placed orders before the project plan was finalized, and is now conducting a comprehensive review of its procurement strategy. "The most aggressive purchaser of gas turbines has now written off the deposit in this way."
Crypto prices
More
